Meta-analysis Promoting resiliency Resilience Resilience intervention.Ĭopyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. Directions for future research on resilience as well as practical considerations are discussed. The program combines ease of use with a wide array of computational options and sophisticated graphics. Variabilities across findings reflect the current ambiguities surrounding the conceptualization and operationalization of resilience. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis is a powerful computer program for meta-analysis. However, empirical results should be cautiously interpreted in tandem with their theoretical relevance and potential advancements to the construct of resilience. 001, with many falling short of the threshold for practical significance.įindings lend some support for the overall efficacy of resilience interventions. 1099), metaanalysis is a research method for systematically combining and synthesizing findings from multiple quantitative studies in a research domain. The variability in study effect sizes within and between studies was significant, p <. Meta-analysis is used to aggregate effect relationships from multiple studies. The multi-level meta-analysis indicated that resilience-promoting interventions yielded a small, but statistically significant overall effect, Hedges's g = 0.48 (SE = 0.04, 95% CI =. Finally, moderators of age, gender, length of intervention, intervention approach, intervention target, and the level of risk exposure of the sampled population were examined as moderators. In addition to overall efficacy, outcome-based analyses were conducted for intervention outcomes based on action, biophysical, coping, emotion, resilience, symptoms, and well-being. A total of 268 studies, with 1584 independent samples, were included in the meta-analysis. Search terms included "resilience intervention" OR "promoting resilience" OR "promoting resiliency" OR "resilience-based intervention". The literature search was conducted on May 28, 2019.
Particular emphasis was placed upon the factors that contribute to variability across interventions, such as age, gender, duration of intervention, intervention approaches and risk exposure of targeted population. The goal of the current meta-analysis is to substantiate existing evidence examining the promotion of resilience through various interventions. Instead, researchers often debate the optimal approach to understanding resilience, while continuing to explore ways to enhance and/or promote its qualities in various populations. There is no current consensus on operational definitions of resilience.
0 kommentar(er)
